factitious: Photo of me in a purple coat after getting a haircut (Default)
[personal profile] factitious
Imagine you're dealing with a formula which has a special type of variable in it. This variable is specified at the outset as being not equal to zero, which is good, because you need to divide by it as part of using the formula. However, the variable does get arbitrarily close to zero. In fact, you're pretty much taking the limit as it goes to zero. And at the end of this, when you get a result that involves this variable, you'll want to treat it as though it's equal to zero so that you can cancel out some terms. But despite this, the variable is by definition nonzero.

So the variable has an interesting and complex relationship with zero, and it's important not to add in any more confusion regarding this. Bearing all that in mind, what letter would you use to denote the variable?

If you said "the letter O," you have what it takes to be an 18th-century mathematician.

Date: 2006-04-26 03:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] factitiouslj.livejournal.com
Uppercase and lowercase letters are fairly distinguishable. I have a commutative algebra book which uses blackletter/roman as a contrasting distinction.

Date: 2006-04-26 03:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] factitiouslj.livejournal.com
Actually, having "a" be an element of a set called "A" is a commonplace in math.

Date: 2006-04-26 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ultraman.livejournal.com
'u' is not an element of 'U', though 'U' is a set, and 'u' is a member of some set.

also the version I have appears to be from a typewriter where the upper/lowercase distinction is harder to determine.

November 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14 15 16 17 18 1920
21222324252627
282930    

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 10:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios